Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:41:42 +0100
Pierre Asselin wrote:
>> Surely it is normal usage to say that theorems in a formal system
>> are true?
>
> Nope.
>
> (Or rather: yes, but only when they really are true.)
Normal people do not say,
"Is the statement that every number is the sum of 4 squares provable?"
They say "Is it true that ..."
You have probably spent too much time among logicians.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
.
- References:
- What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: Bob Stewart
- Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- From: Pierre Asselin
- What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- Prev by Date: Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse)
- Next by Date: Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse)
- Previous by thread: Re: What does G?del's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?
- Next by thread: Re: continued fractions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|