Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Aug 2005 17:35:07 -0700
Timothy Little wrote:
> cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > So you believe that it "might be possible" that there are co-prime
> > natural numbers p and q, such that p^2 = 2*q^2?
>
> It depends what you mean by "natural numbers", co-prime and so forth.
> Usually these terms are defined in terms of some particular system,
> and these systems aren't necessarily all equivalent.
>
> For example, I'm not certain that we can't derive a suitably
> formalized version of "there exists p,q in N such that p^2 = 2 q^2"
> from the axioms of, say, ZFC.
>
> I'm more confident (very very confident, but still not absolutely
> certain) that we can't derive such a theorem from PA.
>
Let's work in the axioms of PA. Suppose we take a more constructivist
approach, and demand instead that an existence proof alone is
insufficient; you must present me with a construction for naturals p
and q such that 2*q^2 = p^2.
How is it not "certain" in your mind that this is not possible?
Cheers - Chas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- References:
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Prev by Date: Math help Forum
- Next by Date: Re: INFINITY Revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Next by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|