Visualizing a measure zero cover of the rationals
- From: Jim Burns <burns.87@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:07:10 -0400
My impression is that covering all the rationals with
intervals with a total length of epsilon > 0 is not a very
controversial result, probably a very basic one in measure
theory. The rationals are countable, so we can list them.
Cover the first rational with e/2, the second with e/4, ...
My problem arose when I tried to visualize this epsilon-sized
covering, spread out everywhere and nowhere. Much later,
it occurred to me that the scheme I was using wasn't really
intended for easy visualization; rather, it was for easy theorem
proving.
I've come up with another scheme that I like. It uses the
continued fraction expansions of the rationals in ( 0, 1),
assigning half the length to the points on the top level
{ 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ...} and the other half of the length to
the rationals in the open intervals between those points,
then recursing down. (I'll be more specific below.)
Some questions I have:
-- I can show that, if all these lengths have a sum, that
sum is epsilon; how would I show they have a sum? (Remember
that these intervals are not distinct.)
-- This scheme looks fractal to me (speaking informally).
Is it fractal (speaking more formally)? What would its
dimension be? Does this hypothetical dimension > 0 have
implications for measure theory?
What I'm talking about:
Let e be an arbitrarily small positive number.
Let k, m, n be positive integers and p, q be rationals.
Let d(p) be the length of the interval covering the rational
p in ( 0, 1).
Define
d(1/n) = e/2^n, for n = 2,3,4,...
d(1/(n+p)) = 1/2^(n+1)*d(p), for n = 1,2,3,... and 0 < p < 1
If SUM_{ 0 < p < 1}( d(p) ) exists, then
SUM_{ 1/(n+1) < p < 1/n}( d(p) ) =
SUM_{ 0 < q < 1}( d( 1/(n+q) ) ) =
1/2^(n+1)*SUM_{ 0 < q < 1 }( d(q) )
SUM_{ 0 < p < 1}( d(p) ) =
SUM_{ n = 2,3,4,...}( d(1/n) ) +
SUM_{ n = 1,2,3,...}(
SUM_{ 1/(n+1) < p < 1/n }( d(p) ) ) =
SUM_{ n = 2,3,4,...}( e/2^n ) +
SUM_{ n = 1,2,3,...}( 1/2^(n+1) )*
SUM_{ 0 < q < 1}( d(q) ) =
e/2 + 1/2*SUM_{ 0 < q < 1}( d(q) )
SUM_{ 0 < p < 1}( d(p) ) = e/2 + 1/2*SUM_{ 0 < q < 1}( d(q) )
SUM_{ 0 < p < 1}( d(p) ) = e
Then, if the sum over the rationals p in ( 0, 1)
of the lengths of intervals d(p) converges, that sum is e.
Jim Burns
.
- Prev by Date: Re: group theory stumper
- Next by Date: Re: Hi, I would like to solve for f(x)
- Previous by thread: Graph theory (drawing) references
- Next by thread: Cardinality of Real Numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|