Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2005 18:41:29 -0700
Han de Bruijn wrote:
>There is no way to tell a mathematician that the axioms of the Zermelo
>Fraenkel / axiom of Choice (ZFC) system are "not good". Because then he
>will defend himself as our would-be Einstein character did. All of his
>arguments will be consistent with the system he believes in. He wants
>to remain in his vicious circle, safe and well. Calling everybody else
>a "dude" and a "crank" and a "zealot". And there is no way out. There
>is no cure for his madness. Because mathematics is what mathematicians
>do. The ultimate vicious circle.
Han, that is brilliant!
Where do you get the energy to keep arguing with these "Einstein"
types?
.
- References:
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Next by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Index(es):