Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:11:21 -0700
On 29 Aug 2005 16:55:44 -0700, deepkdeb@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>You are completely right. Given A, B one gets C and D. But given C, D
>one can not determine A, B in general. In my case taking k-th root was
>not necessary. Hence my claim. I am grateful to you for the time and
>inteest you have shown to help me out.
For me, it was a teaching challenge, and also, it was fun finding a
counterexample.
Keep up the questions. At the same time, struggle with the ideas
yourself, and where possible, go for depth of understanding -- after
all, you're deepkdeb.
quasi
.
- References:
- Rational and irrational numbers
- From: deepkdeb
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: deepkdeb
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: Keith A. Lewis
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: deepkdeb
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: quasi
- Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- From: deepkdeb
- Rational and irrational numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF
- Next by Date: Re: INFINITY Revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Rational and irrational numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|