Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:04:45 +0200
david petry wrote:
Certainly group theory and algebraic topology have uses in physics, and anything that is useful in physics must make testable predictions.
Point set topology is another story.
Yeah. I have still to see a sensible application of PST ...
BTW. Can someone come up with an _overview_ of everything that carries the name "topology"? With a short explanation what the differences are. It seems to me that there are many of the kind. What is their genealogy?
Please?
Han de Bruijn
.
- References:
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers
- Next by Date: Re: expected number of flips to get two of the same value
- Previous by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Next by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Index(es):