Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 18:54:13 -0700
anand_bheemaraju@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello Everyone, I am Anand , an undergraduate from India. I think I
> have stepped upon a new and simple proof of the Four color Theorem. I
> would like to submit it as a paper in some journals , but before I do
> that I would like to know whether the proof is a valid one or not and
> also whether the proof has been submitted already or not.
>
> you can find a copy of the proof at
> http://anandbh.cjb.cc/FOUR%20COLOR%20PROBLEM.pdf
>
> Any suggestions and replies are well appreciated.
Lots of people beat me to it, but I have one more complaint.
You can use your regularization to 4-color a planar graph with a loop
in it. However, any graph with a loop in it cannot be colored, even
with a large number of colors. So your proof must be wrong for this
reason (as well).
You're not giving Brooks enough credit here. That every graph is
(D+1)-colorable is obvious (where D is the maximum degree); use a
"greedy" coloring algorithm. Brooks's Theorem proper is that you can
use D colors unless:
(a) D = 2 and the graph contains an odd cycle (as a component); or
(b) D > 2 and the graph contains a K_D (as a component).
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- References:
- New proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: anand_bheemaraju
- New proof of Four Color Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem
- Next by Date: Re: How to build a k-partite graph?
- Previous by thread: Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem
- Next by thread: uniqueness of a solution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|