Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF

You said:

George: Your supposed "clean, updated version with typos corrected and
fixes or improved clarity regarding the objections raised" looks at
first glance to be a completely new proof (though I imagine it is
essentially the same beneath the surface). I do not have the will to
start all over again so I will continue with the proof previously
worked on, below.

It is the same but not shown previously by one of us. It is a original
clarification of my proof about wich I ask for Mathematical argument
against it.It is the same proof more clarified with the statements
justified in detail in original way.
george
So examen it and will take for you less efort and time
george
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Indicator of the "difference" between two curves
    ... clarification. ... I thank you and George for your invaluable explainations. ... generates them is old and it has very limited output options: ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Night/fall (C&C)
    ... George, I went over some of my comments I wrote last night and ... realized they needed some definite elaboration as well as some ... clarification. ... I'm re-working my critique right now, ...
    (rec.arts.poems)
  • Re: About procedures in microsoft support
    ... You're welcome, George. ... Pl see Harald's clarification as well .. ... Singapore ...
    (microsoft.public.excel)
  • Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF
    ... George: Your supposed "clean, updated version with typos corrected and ... first glance to be a completely new proof (though I imagine it is ... > If we expand the parantheses in above expression we get: ... >> Lame method the above equality is Immpossible. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Stocks
    ... mark so I hope George you bought more at $12 that be good! ... The British Prime Minister of all people had clarity and took decisive ...
    (rec.travel.cruises)
Quantcast