Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little <tim-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> But then the verification process is not a verification of some
> statement of PA; it is a verification that the physical device indeed
> does obey the axioms we originally posited.
I think it's a verification of both. Of course, the match between the
axioms and the actual behaviour is where I'd look first if something
went wrong.
I'd be seriously weirded out if I couldn't find a discrepancy in that
step, and nor could a bunch of highly respected people. Weirded out
in a sense like winning the lottery twice in a row.
> So the prediction "for any p, q, |2*p^2 - q^2| > 0", when verified on a
> physical device such as a compuetr, is a prediction that the computer
> obeys PA - not that the above statement is "true" (for whatever values
> of "true" apply currently :)).
It will usually be, but I don't think it *must* be. I'm not 100%
convinced that PA is sound (even if it's consistent). Just 99.9+% :)
Finding out that a theorem of PA happens to be false would fall into
that <0.1% category. (Plus a hefty dose of unlikelihood for it being
discovered in *my* life)
- Tim
.
- References:
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jiri Lebl
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: david petry
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- From: cbrown
- Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following
- Next by Date: Re: Matrixproduct or scalar multiplied with matrix?
- Previous by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Next by thread: Re: Han's startling new set theory.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|