Re: infinity
- From: stephen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> stephen@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>> Tony's definition of a finite set includes sets that never end.
>> He has agreed that the set of all finite natural numbers
>> does not end, and apparently agrees that the number of finite
>> natural numbers is not finite. However the set is still "finite"
>> according to Tony's definition.
> According to Tony's handwaving. I have yet to see any definition of
> finiteness from him.
I was going to put definition in quotes, but I changed my mind. :)
Stephen
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: change of variable in multiple integrations...
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
