Re: infinity
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:23:41 +0200
stephen@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Tony's definition of a finite set includes sets that never end.
> He has agreed that the set of all finite natural numbers
> does not end, and apparently agrees that the number of finite
> natural numbers is not finite. However the set is still "finite"
> according to Tony's definition.
According to Tony's handwaving. I have yet to see any definition of
finiteness from him.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: number sequence
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
