Re: Han's startling new set theory.


*** T. Winter wrote:

> Let me make a testable prediction: Li(x) < pi(x), where Li is the
> logarithmic integral and pi is the number of primes less than or
> equal to x. Actually, this was a prediction made both by Gauss and
> Riemann. How do you (David Petry) propose to test it?

You have made infinitely many testable predictions, one for each x.
Each one can be tested by computation. Obviously you cannot prove
your assertion is true for every x by testing finitely many instances.

.

Quantcast