Re: 0^0
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:10:38 GMT, Risto Lankinen wrote:
> "David Kastrup" <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:85fyspx7lk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Ulrich Sondermann" <usondermann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> x^0 is a product containing exactly 0 factors of x, so the value of x
>> is completely irrelevant to the result. Just like 0*x is a sum
>> containing exactly 0 summands of x, making the value of x completely
>> irrelevant to the result.
> 0*inf = ?!?
If A is any set, the cardinality of the Cartesian product {} x A
satisfies |{} x A| = 0.
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Adjointness of Free Modules
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: 0^0
- Next by thread: Re: 0^0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
