Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:21:35 +1000
In article <1125629663.722167.70590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It isn't proof. It lies, in that it claims there is a 4-coloring but
> maybe it can't produce it. You need to actually show that it gives the
> right answer 100% of the time; 99% doesn't count.
100% isn't good enough, either, as 100% of an infinite set
can still leave out infinitely many examples. 100% of the integers
are composite.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- References:
- Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: anand_bheemaraju
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: anand_bheemaraju
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- From: Proginoskes
- Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: What is nonselfadjoint theoy
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|