Re: what makes it true?
- From: "Jumbie" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:59:16 -0500
<lhlhsand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125682794.213992.12360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Are mathematical statements considered true (or false) independent of
> whether or not they've been proven? If so, then what exactly is it
> that makes them true (or false), if not the proof? I know it's kind of
> a weird question but it makes me curious. Like for instance take the
> statement "There are exactly 4 primes between 1 and 10." I know this
> is true because if I divide each number between 1 and 10 I find that
> only 2, 3, 5, and 7 don't have integral factors other than 1 and
> themselves. And by resorting to the definition of prime number, I
> conclude that the statement is true. But isn't this method in itself a
> kind of "proof"? I'm confused!
>
> L
1 is prime. Your statement is false.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: odin
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Robert Low
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: what makes it true?
- References:
- what makes it true?
- From: lhlhsand
- what makes it true?
- Prev by Date: Re: Alternative Goldbach?
- Next by Date: Re: The slug and the kilogram
- Previous by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Index(es):
Loading