Re: INFINITY Revisited
- From: imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 2 Sep 2005 20:48:49 -0700
Don Whitehurst wrote:
> What is the difference between a digit string and a character sting?
> How do the infintesimals 0.00...01 not meet the meaning of a "decimal
> digit at digit position n for each position n"? Is it because there is
> no last n in the naturals?
Basically yes (you've answered your own question). The idea of a
nonterminating decimal fraction is that it, uh, has no end (which is
what 'nonterminating' means, of course). For some reason, lots of
people have terrible difficulty with this - they have never (obviously)
in real life encountered something which extended linearly to left and
to right, without having an end at the left and an end at the right. So
when we say, consider the naturals as the unending sequence
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...
where the dots represent the fact that this extends endlessly to the
right, all goes well for about one or two sentences, then they start
talking about the rightmost element. Well, with luck, you can see that
this is nonsense.
Incidentally, your first question above isn't _quite_ right. Dave
Seaman said "those are character strings", but of course so are the
valid representations of real numbers. He might more helpfully have
said "Those are merely character strings (with no interpretation as
real numbers)". The fact that one can string symbols together is no
guarantee that they mean anything, as witness large quantities of word
salad one sees in sci.math threads.
Brian Chandler
http://imaginatorium.org
.
- References:
- Re: INFINITY Revisited
- From: Don Whitehurst
- Re: INFINITY Revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: cofinite topology......
- Next by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Previous by thread: Re: INFINITY Revisited
- Next by thread: Re: INFINITY Revisited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|