Re: Math "From Scratch"



In <1125877967.959142.79900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on
09/04/2005
at 04:52 PM, rodney.elliott@xxxxxxxxx said:

>Whilst revising the basics of undergraduate calculus I got to
>thinking about all the math that I/we all take for granted and never
>question because its so fundamental. I have been wondering if it is
>possible to develop the rudiments of a workable number system "from
>scratch", justifying any assumptions made along the way.

Sure, but the issues that you discuss later relate to Etymology rather
than to Mathematics.

>For example, lets say you start with a blank piece of paper and your
>goal is to end up with R - the set of real numbers. What you are
>likely to do is start with the set N of natural numbers and then
>work your way up from there,

Only if the goal is to develop a model of R. Otherwise I'd just give
suitable axioms.

>1. What are the origins of the squiggles we make on paper to
>represent the natural numbers - 1, 2 etc?

That is an historical question and has nothing to do with the
Mathematics. Is there a sci.etymology news group? Similarly for your
second question.

>3. Is the concept of quantity and variations in quantity learned or
>innate?

That's Psychology rather than Mathematics.

>It just seems to me that there is nothing natural about N
>whatsoever.

Well, there's nothing irrational about sqrt(2) and nothing complex
about 1+i; the map is not the territory. Nor is there any reason to
start from N. IMHO it makes more sense to start from Group Theory,
using suitable manipulables. The Montessori people might be able to
help there.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Welcome to . These suggestions may help you. [39]
    ... Messages posted to may be about mathematics at any ... Some questions may have better luck in a more specialized news group ... For mathematical news groups there are detailed FAQ at ... please add a JSH clause: JSH has gone to Tweet on Twitter. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Welcome to . These suggestions may help you.
    ... Some questions may have better luck in a more specialized news group ... You will rarely need * for multiplication, but use plenty of ... and some cranks presume to know more mathematics than they ... For mathematical news groups there are detailed FAQ at   ...
    (sci.math)
  • Welcome to . These suggestions may help you. [38]
    ... than one news group) - see section 6 below. ... and some cranks stubbornly claim to know more mathematics than ... plenty of users who want to discuss mathematics without rude arguments. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Welcome to . These suggestions may help you. [39]
    ... Some questions may have better luck in a more specialized news group ... and some cranks stubbornly claim to know more mathematics than ... plenty of users who want to discuss mathematics without rude arguments. ... For mathematical news groups there are detailed FAQ at   ...
    (sci.math)
  • Welcome to . These suggestions may help you. [40]
    ... Some questions may have better luck in a more specialized news group ... You will rarely need * for multiplication, but use plenty of ... and some cranks presume to know more mathematics than they ... For mathematical news groups there are detailed FAQ at   ...
    (sci.math)