Re: infinity

From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:53:47 -0600

In article <MPG.1d87af0094052be498a1ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That only proves there is no largest whole number. So what? Does the
> lack of a largest finite mean that there can be no infinites? What is
> your point?

It proves that the set of finite whole numbers can be infinite without
needing any infinite whole numbers.
.

References:
- Re: infinity
  - From: stephen
- Re: infinity
  - From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
  - From: stephen
- Re: infinity
  - From: aeo6

Prev by Date: Re: infinity
Next by Date: Re: infinity
Previous by thread: Re: infinity
Next by thread: Re: infinity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread