Re: what makes it true?
- From: grubb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Daniel Grubb)
- Date: 7 Sep 2005 13:46:05 GMT
>Virtually everybody, irrespective of their philosophical or religious
>views, believes that the Continuum Hypothesis is either true or false,
>even though it has not yet been proved which, and conceivably never
>will be.
Hmmmm. My take is that 'CH or (not CH)' is true (because it is provable),
but I don't think it's meaningful to claim CH is either true or false
in any absolute sense. Our 'intended model' of set theory is just too
vague. We might, perhaps, decide to adopt *another* axiom that will settle
the issue, but that's an independent thing. *smile* Whether we choose to
adopt such an axiom will be based on whether that axiom can prove 'pretty'
results, not on whether it is true in some absolute sense. We will
probably also want the new axiom to be independent of the ones we already
have.
--Dan Grubb
.
- References:
- what makes it true?
- From: lhlhsand
- Re: what makes it true?
- From:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- what makes it true?
- Prev by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Previous by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by thread: Re: F_sigma
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|