Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 07 Sep 2005 15:42:19 +0200
Esa A E Peuha <esa.peuha@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Why not?
It is not a consequence of the completeness theorem that PA proves
"if GC is true then GC is provable in PA". What is your reasoning
here?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Esa A E Peuha
- Re: what makes it true?
- References:
- what makes it true?
- From: lhlhsand
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Esa A E Peuha
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Esa A E Peuha
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Esa A E Peuha
- what makes it true?
- Prev by Date: Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR
- Next by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Previous by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|