Re: infinity
- From: imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 8 Sep 2005 07:09:46 -0700
Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> Virgil wrote:
> > In article <MPG.1d8907213041699698a219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > I showed that no set of strings up to and including any finite length
> > > can possibly be finite. This applies to ALL finite length strings, so
> > > it applies to ALL the strings in your set of finite strings. What I
> > > showed is that you can ONLY have an infinite set of strings if you
> > > have strings of infinite length, which you don't.
> >
> > If, as TO keeps claiming, the set of all finite strings were truly
> > finite, the concatenation of all those finite strings would still be a
> > finite string, but longer than any string in the *finite* set of *all*
> > finite strings.
>
> Yeah, so what. Ord would be an ordinal.
Who is 'Ord', actually?
> If it's an infinite set, it's infinite.
Right, and if it's a green set, it's green. Similarly for yellow and
pink.
> Ord is order type of ordinals.
> Well-order the reals. Why doesn't that imply adjacent points in the
> normal ordering of the reals?
Because there is not necessarily any relationship between the
well-ordering and the natural ordering. In fact, as is obvious, there
are no adjacent points in the reals, so the "necessarily" can be
deleted without changing the meaning.
I suppose you probably knew that already. Never mind - tell us again:
are infinite sets equivalent?
> You address finitists in your arguments about the infinite? That's
> strange.
You've forgotten your lines, Ross.
Brian Chandler
http://imaginatorium.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading