Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
On 08-09-2005 17:34, Michael Stemper wrote:
I'm trying to prove that there isn't a homeomorphism between [0,1]
and (0,1), and I'm stuck. What I know so far is the definitions of
homeomorphism and continuity.
Suppose that there was a homeomorphism f:[0,1] --> ]0,1[. It's
continuous, and so, by Weierstrass' theorem, it has a maximum and a
minimum; let's call them M and m respectively. You know that m and M
belong to ]0,1[ and that f([0,1]) is a subset of [m,M]. Therefore, f is
not surjective.
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
... and, and I'm stuck. ... What I know so far is the definitions of homeomorphism and continuity. ... Math Tutor in Central New Jersey and Manhattan ... (sci.math) - Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
... >>and, and I'm stuck. ... >>homeomorphism and continuity. ... connectedness; and that connectedness is a homeomorphic ... (sci.math) - Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
... >continuous, and so, by Weierstrass' theorem, ... definitions of metric space, continuity, and homeomorphism. ... For anybody playing along at home, this exercise is a post script ... (sci.math) - Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
... >>>and, and I'm stuck. ... >>>homeomorphism and continuity. ... >connectedness; and that connectedness is a homeomorphic ... (sci.math) - Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
... >>> and, and I'm stuck. ... >>continuous, and so, by Weierstrass' theorem, ... >definitions of metric space, continuity, and homeomorphism. ... (sci.math) |
|