Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:54:04 -0500
In article <3ob7q4F54kquU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jose Carlos Santos writes:
>On 08-09-2005 17:34, Michael Stemper wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to prove that there isn't a homeomorphism between [0,1]
>> and (0,1), and I'm stuck. What I know so far is the definitions of
>> homeomorphism and continuity.
>
>Suppose that there was a homeomorphism f:[0,1] --> ]0,1[. It's
>continuous, and so, by Weierstrass' theorem,
Thanks for the reply. However, all that I've learned so far is the
definitions of metric space, continuity, and homeomorphism. I certainly
haven't encountered this theorem yet.
For anybody playing along at home, this exercise is a post script
to Exercise C, Chapter III, in _Topology_, by George McCarty.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
This sentence no verb.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: quasi
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- References:
- No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: José Carlos Santos
- No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Prev by Date: Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR
- Next by Date: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Previous by thread: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Next by thread: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|