Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph)
- Date: 8 Sep 2005 14:03:37 -0400
mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper) writes:
>>> I'm trying to prove that there isn't a homeomorphism between [0,1]
>>> and (0,1), and I'm stuck. What I know so far is the definitions of
>>> homeomorphism and continuity.
[suggested answer]
>Thanks for the reply. However, all that I've learned so far is the
>definitions of metric space, continuity, and homeomorphism. I certainly
>haven't encountered this theorem yet.
Hmm. Are you *sure* you haven't learned anything about, say,
sequences in a metric space, their convergence and their non-
convergence? Because, if you have, I think I can give you a
suggestion.
Lee Rudolph (which might even be correct)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- References:
- No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- From: Michael Stemper
- No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Prev by Date: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Next by Date: connected subsets of R^2
- Previous by thread: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Next by thread: Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|