Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 14:35:30 -0400
Virgil said:
> In article <MPG.1d88ef739553a0a798a20f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Virgil said:
> > > In article <MPG.1d87ab329c1e2e3998a1ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Virgil said:
> > >
> > > > > Same tree, same labels on branches, no labels on nodes.
> > > > >
> > > > No, you have two different trees.
> > >
> > > Since all maximal binary trees are tree-isomorphic, any difference would
> > > make no difference. So the issue is irrelevant.
> > >
> > Aren't all balls ball-isomorphic?
>
> TO's balls are not in any way isomorphic to anything real.
>
My point is that the labels don't matter. Just examine what happens to the
number of the balls going in and out and you have the answer.
--
Smiles,
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|