Re: Expected value
- From: israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel)
- Date: 8 Sep 2005 19:53:58 GMT
In article <4320866B.4020907@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stephen J. Herschkorn <sjherschko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Actually, a better approximation would be 303.5/3.5 = 86.714. This
>follows from the fact the final sum is approximately uniformly
>distributed on {301, 302,..., 306}. In fact, if we let the goal (300 in
>the original problem) grow arbitrarily large, the limiting distribution
>of the overshoot is discrete uniform.
Nonsense. A final sum of 306 can only happen in one way: hit 300 and
then roll a 6. A final sum of 301 can happen if you hit 295 and roll 6,
or hit 296 and roll 5, or ... So the final sum is about 6 times as
likely to be 301 as 306. An exact calculation shows the probability
of ending with 300+k is within 1.8*10^(-42) of (7-k)/21 for k = 1 to 6.
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expected value
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Expected value
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Expected value
- References:
- Expected value
- From: TCL
- Re: Expected value
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Expected value
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Expected value
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: Expected value
- Next by thread: Re: Expected value
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|