Re: what makes it true?
- From: grubb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Daniel Grubb)
- Date: 9 Sep 2005 14:01:45 GMT
>> The problem is that I don't think that there is any such thing as
>> "the" natural numbers as distinct from any formal theory. "The"
>> natural numbers are partially refined by the properties that are
>> proved of them.
> This philosophical doctrine is not easy to grasp. The "as distinct
>from any formal theory" is particularly puzzling. Just what do you
>take to be the relation between formal systems and the natural
>numbers?
The natural numbers are formally *defined* via some formal system.
--Dan Grubb
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: what makes it true?
- References:
- what makes it true?
- From: lhlhsand
- Re: what makes it true?
- From:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From:
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Dave Rusin
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: what makes it true?
- From: Torkel Franzen
- what makes it true?
- Prev by Date: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by Date: Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?
- Previous by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Next by thread: Re: what makes it true?
- Index(es):