Re: infinity


aeo6 Tony Orlow wrote:
> Is the largest finite finite, but not a number?

It's nonexistent. No it's not a number, and certainly not
a finite number.

> Answer your own questions for
> once. I have already shown

Well, you've TO-proven, which is different from proven.

> that the largest finite natural and the size of the
> set of finite naturals are one and the same number. Does one exist while the
> other doesn't?

Yes. The largest finite does not exist, but the "size" of the
set of finite naturals does exist.

- Randy

.

Quantcast