Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:58:42 +1000
In article <dftak2$eqs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) wrote:
> israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel) writes:
>
> >In article <4321DEAF.A5EBBECA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >Jim Spriggs <jim.sprigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>In the UK at a certain level in junior school (I don't recall the age
> >>precisely) arithmetic was called "sums" even though other arithmetical
> >>operations were studied. I don't don't know if it still is, but from
> >>time to time I come across things like
> >>
> >> The division sum 6/3 = 2.
> >>
> >>It looks odd to me.
> >
> >It looks even to me.
>
> Even to me, it looks odd.
Oddly, to me, it looks even.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- References:
- Why sci.math?
- From: Shytot
- Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Shytot
- Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Why sci.math?
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Why sci.math?
- Prev by Date: Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?
- Next by Date: Re: Infinity =/= Infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: Why sci.math?
- Next by thread: Re: Why sci.math?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|