Re: infinity
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:30 -0600
In article <MPG.1d8fa3832b32407c98a28b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When you look at a set of consecutive whole numbers starting from 1,
> if you know the set size, you know the last element, and if you know
> the last element you know the set size.
And if you know that there is no last element you also, if you are not
TO, know the set size. namely that of the first non-finite ordinal.
However, for the set as a
> whole, you claim the set isze is infinite, and all elements are
> finite, which is a contradiction.
If it is, no one has been able to prove it by any legitimate arguments.
The arguments that TO makes are not legitimate enough for even for a
high school logic class.
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: stephen
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|