Re: infinity
- From: albstorz@xxxxxx
- Date: 21 Sep 2005 07:24:14 -0700
*** T. Winter wrote:
> In article <1127306122.176798.18730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> albstorz@xxxxxx writes:
> ...
> > To see it better, you may have A1 which contains X1, A2 which containes
> > X1 and X2, A3 which contains X1, X2, X3. And so on.
> > Now the sequence of Ai reaches an infinite A in spite of the sequence
> > of Xi not. All Xi always stays finite. Why there is no infinite X but
> > an infinite A???
>
> The sequence of Ai does not *reach* an infinite A, in spite of you
> stating so.
> --
> *** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
> home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
That's it what I call magic: How do you get an infinite set whether no
set becomes infinite?????
Regards
AS
.
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: Isometries
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Loading