Re: Limit
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:47:38 -0500
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:51:08 +0200, Antonia Senton <ants33b@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>[...]
>>>That is not a counterexample since I stated above that g is assumed to
>>>be continuous in both arguments
No, you did not state that!
Also, as I explained in my post here, there are at least two
different things you might mean by "g is continuous in both
arguments".
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Limit
- Next by Date: Nonzero derivative
- Previous by thread: Re: Limit
- Next by thread: Re: Limit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|