Re: infinity
- From: Matt Gutting <tchrmatt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:16:39 -0400
Robert Low wrote:
William Hughes wrote:
You have just described the set natural numbers, an infinite set (bijection exists to a proper subset) that has only finite elements. There is nothing strange about this, why should the elements of an infinite set have to be infinite (couldn't we have an infinite set of purple kumquats)?
Only if some of the kumquats were infinitely purple.
But how would you ever go about eating them all?!
Yum, kumquats! (Yumquats?) .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infinity
- From: Robert Low
- Re: infinity
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: infinity
- From: aeo6
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: infinity
- From: William Hughes
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: help polylogarithm1
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Loading