Re: infinity



Virgil said:
> In article <MPG.1da4b2a483ce0d7698a3b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > David R Tribble said:
> > > Tony Orlow wrote:
> > > > The range as maximum possible difference cannot be specified
> > > > without specification of the bounds of the set, but in any case, the
> > > > maximum
> > > > possible difference is not infinite if no differences can possibly be
> > > > infinite.
> > >
> > > Can the maximum possible difference be unbounded if the differences
> > > between any members are unbounded?
> > >
> > >
> > I would say so, yes. The range of the finite naturals is an unboundedly large
> > finite value.
>
> Unboundedly large finite value?
>
> Such a thing is an ultimate oxymoron. Every finite value is its own
> bound, so that no value can be simultaneously finite and unbounded.
>
> Any system, like TOmatics, that depends on the existence of such
> impossibilities is thereby self-contradictory, and thus mathematically
> useless.
>
Hmmm you didn't object when David Tribble, I believe it was, used the same
phrase. Funny.
--
Smiles,

Tony
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Well Ordering the Reals
    ... > You think of "countability" far too literally. ... >> David R Tribble said: ... >> even though both the set of reals and the set of hyperintegers are ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Well Ordering the Reals
    ... David R Tribble said: ... > hyperintegers, not the reals in the unit interval. ... >> implicit infinite string of leading 0's which add no value to the sum, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... > David R Tribble said: ... >>> of infinite value), there could be only one such number, for the simple ... > Hmmm. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... David R Tribble wrote: ... If you list these H-riffic numbers as a binary tree, ... Which means it is not a node in the binary tree of H-riffics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Two results of set geometry
    ... David R Tribble wrote: ... All of these infinities in your spectrum must be of the "actual" ... Tony Orlow wrote: ...
    (sci.math)