Re: to first order ??
- From: Jim Spriggs <jim.sprigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:15:21 +0000 (UTC)
Zinc Potterman wrote:
>
> Wow thanks for the help
>
> One little thing
> In the first response World Wide Wade wrote
>
> r(x)
>
> Any clues what this means would be nice.
"r" for remainder.
delta f = (df/dx)*delta x plus the remaining bits and pieces that we'll
not spell out explicitly but just note that they get small fast enough.
--
I don't know who you are Sir, or where you come from,
but you've done me a power of good.
.
- References:
- Re: to first order ??
- From: Dave L. Renfro
- Re: to first order ??
- Prev by Date: Re: Crash Course in Formal Proofs?
- Next by Date: GF(16) and irreducible polynomials
- Previous by thread: Re: to first order ??
- Next by thread: Re: to first order ??
- Index(es):