Re: Missing equality operator
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:38:27 -0700
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Dan Piponi wrote:
> Define a = b if neither a<b nor a>b.
>
I've not the time nor the inclination for the clerical
chore of back tracking the thread to reconstruct the
line of thought. If you want intelligent and well thought
answers, then include the context pertinent to your reply
and to whom your are talking.
Please learn and use better math group manners as demonstrated
by other participants of this newsgroup and as described at
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#quote
If you're using Google's quick reply, please don't, use quote feature
instead. Many of us have different news browsers than Google.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Missing equality operator
- From: Dan Piponi
- Re: Missing equality operator
- Prev by Date: Re: 3rd Experiment |OR| Infinity
- Next by Date: Re: riemann vs lebesgue integrals
- Previous by thread: Re: Super harmonic functions?
- Next by thread: Re: Missing equality operator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
