Re: infinity
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:52:39 +0200
"Jonathan Hoyle" <jonhoyle@xxxxxxx> writes:
> It certainly does not imply that. Well-ordering the reals will use a
> different <= operation than the normal ordering. What is required by a
> well-ordering is any comparison operation (which we denote <= but is
> not the usual less than or equal to) such that for any a,b in R either
> a<=b or b<=a
Strike the "either".
> and that any non-empty subset of R has a "first" element (in the
> sense of our new <=).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: Cholesky decomposition or otherwise-
- Next by Date: Re: Construct a 2-connected graph from a connected graph with minimum edge insertion
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|