Re: Question on integral extensions,,
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
In article <di6058$bmfk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James <James545@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>It is true that if S is a finitely generated R-module, then S is an integral
>extension of R. But it was claimed in my class today that the other
>direction is true as well.
>
>But isn't Q-bar integral over Q,
Yes.
>but Q-bar is an infinite dimensional vector
>space over Q, so it is not finitely generated as a Q-module?
What was the exact statement made? Surely not that "If S is an
integral extension of R, then S is a finitely generated R-module".
What is true is the following:
"If S is an integral extension of R, then for every s in S, R[s] is a
finitely generated R-module."
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on integral extensions,,
- From: James
- Re: Question on integral extensions,,
- References:
- Question on integral extensions,,
- From: James
- Question on integral extensions,,
- Prev by Date: Re: riemann vs lebesgue integrals
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Question on integral extensions,,
- Next by thread: Re: Question on integral extensions,,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|