Re: Fourier transform and the like
- From: "Michael Jørgensen" <ccc59035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:12:56 +0200
"S. Gammelmark" <gammelmark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129057102.932756.106990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> In Fourier seris/transforms we have a way to represent certain
> functions as an infinte 'linear combination' of the functions e^(ikx),
> where k\in Z or k\in R as in the fourier transform (I think. I'm not
> entirely sure here, but isn't the Fourier transform precicely a way of
> decomposing af function into a continuous function telling me the
> amplitudes of a e^(ikx)-term where k \in R ?)
>
> This we can also use to decompose a digital signal into frequencies
> (with certain limitations).
>
> My question is - how can we (if at all) use other functions to do this
> (I'm thinking especially e^(kx) here)? As an integral transform, or as
> a way of decomposing a digital signal into amplitudes of e^(kx)
> functions?
>
> I hope the question is clear.
No it's not! At least not to me.
Anyway, you probably already know this, but if you restrict yourself to R+
(i.e. x >= 0), then you may consider the Laplace transform.
-Michael.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fourier transform and the like
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Fourier transform and the like
- Prev by Date: Re: A short, exact perimeter of ellipse, without pi, angles, or eliptic modulus
- Next by Date: Re: The "Prototype Proof "of Fermat Last Theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Fourier transform and the like
- Next by thread: Re: Fourier transform and the like
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|