Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Oct 2005 14:21:47 -0700
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
> "Elmo" <elmoritz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > We can say:
> > 1.Two coins were flipped. We know because our statement told us so.
> > 2.All we know about the coin flip, we learned from the statement.
> > 3.We know that TT did not happen.
> > 4.We know that HH happened, and the statement was made, or, HT happened
> > and the statement was made, or, TH happened and the statement was made.
> > 5.Two coins were tossed is a statement of fact.
> > 6."At least one is a head" is a conditional statement.
>
> I have held my tongue until now, but in what reasonable sense is "at
> least one is a head" a conditional statement? It is no less factual
> than "two coins were tossed."
>
> Utterly bizarre.
>
> Conditional statements are statements of the form: If X then Y. Or Y,
> given X. Or Y only if X. Or....
>
> "At least one is a head" is not a stinking conditional statement.
Eldon has been obsessing about this probability calculation
for years.
See, for instance, this page from 1998:
http://www.wiskit.com/marilyn/boys.html
I think his answer would be something like "You don't know
the conditions under which the person would tell you that
at least one is a head. In the case HT/TH, they might
be equally likely to say that one is a tail."
He has severe problems with the idea of "given" and insists
on constructing elaborate behavioral scenarios involving
the means by which you obtain the information that at
least one is a head.
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- References:
- Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Richard Tobin
- Me and David C. Ullrich
- Prev by Date: Re: CALCULUS HELP: How Am I Supposed To Come Up With This?
- Next by Date: Re: flush
- Previous by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Next by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|