Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:11:34 GMT
In article <1129157379.258250.88480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Elmo" <elmoritz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
....
> I am not a mathematician. I have about 25 hours of college math. I am
> an intelligent person who has spent a lot of time on this one question.
Yes. Your problem is *not* with mathematics. It is a liguistic problem.
In natural languages it is quite frequent that sentences are ambiguous.
In mathematics it is common to disambiguate such sentences by conventions
or definitions. In mathematics the two sentences mean the same thing
(by convention, or whatever). And the different results are completely
irrelevant, because there is a single meaning, so in mathematics there
is only a single result.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- References:
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof of existence of function
- Next by Date: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Previous by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Next by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Index(es):