Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: john_ramsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Oct 2005 07:19:11 -0700
Elmo wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> 8.I say that "given at least one" is the special case whereas, "at
> least one is a head" is stated with extreme prejudice toward heads, or,
> "at least one is a tail" is stated with extreme prejudice toward tails.
>
> 9.State "at least one is a head" with extreme prejudice toward tails,
> and the probability for two heads would be one.
What the _heck_ are you on about with all this "extreme prejudice"
stuff?! Sounds like you've seen too many Gene Hackman thrillers.
Maybe you have a shadowy subconscious association of the word "given"
with something benevolent like a "gift", which by contrast makes the
direct phrase "at least one is a head" sound blunt and final, like
some assassin calmly plugging their victim with "at least one head"
shot! Crazy I know, but if you ask me so is this entire discussion.
Mind you, that's about the fourth theory I've put forward - You
demolish them, one after the other, with each reply! I feel like
that 19th C British PM Sir William Gladstone, about whom someone
said "Each time he thinks he's answered the Irish Question, the
Irish change the question!"
Cheers
John R Ramsden (jhnrmsdn@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
* Remove m from com to reply
* "From" address defunct
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- References:
- Me and David C. Ullrich
- From: Elmo
- Me and David C. Ullrich
- Prev by Date: Re: infinity
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Next by thread: Re: Me and David C. Ullrich
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|