Re: infinity

David Kastrup said:
> Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I specifically stated that if there is no maximum or no minimum, the
> > range is to be considered less than the LUB of the differences.
>
> How much less?
>
> > So, it's not functionally equivalent.
>
>
Stricly less. range of [0,1) is <1. Range of the finites is <oo.
--
Smiles,

Tony
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tetration
    ... Good luck, and thanks. ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Tetration
    ... Thanks, and good luck! ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... And both through the eye of the same needle!!! ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >>> Smiles, ... >>> Tony ... > 0.999...999 is the last first-level infinitesimal in the first unit. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
    ... infinity doesn't exist. ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)