Re: Me and David C. Ullrich

In article <1129208402.035268.230030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Elmo" <elmoritz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
....
> > Um. Even you should realize that this last bit is just silly.
> > The reason people think you don't understand this question is
> > exactly _because_ of the things you've written about it!
> >
> > I mean really, why else would people come to that conclusion?
> > (Correctly or not...)
....
> This is about as much as you have added to our arguments.

Yes, and actually this is about as much as should be said. It is all
the same argument over and over again. Nothing news crops up since
you started this a few years ago. You are not going to convince the
mathematical community and the mathematical community is not going to
convince you.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.

Quantcast