Re: infinity
- From: "David R Tribble" <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Oct 2005 09:39:41 -0700
Daryl McCullough said:
>> How many times do you have to be told: There *is* no largest
>> finite! aleph_0 is placed after *all* finite ordinals.
>
Tony Orlow wrote:
> And has no predecessor. Good way to kludge away the largest finite.
>
The smallest natural also has no predecessor. Is that a kludge?
Also, there is no largest infinite. Is that a kludge?
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: infinity
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: infinity
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: infinity
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: Sum of periodic functions with incommensurate periods
- Next by Date: Re: infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading