Re: Cantor



I don't think you understood. The difficulty here is that Cantor did
not say that for any list of Reals we can find one not on the list.
That property is also true of the integers.

Cantor postulated the *complete* list of reals. We have to imagine
that we have completely listed all reals. Now we use this complete
list to produce something not on the list.

It is absolutely necessary to postulate the reals in their entirety.
Have a look around at the arguments surrounding 'potential' and
'actual' infinities. This should clarify the argument.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: First diagnal proof for real numbers
    ... expansions of real numbers and diagonalization. ... already Russell in 1903, contrary to Cantor, explicitly considers ... the non-uniqueness of expansions, he was well aware of it. ... of constructing the reals from the rationals by the use ...
    (sci.math.research)
  • Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
    ... Nonetheless Dedekind as well as Cantor, Hilbert, Zermelo, etc. did not ... do not understand what makes the reals different from the rationals. ... characterization of reals as infinite decimals, ... from mathematics if one respects genuine rigorosity. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A wise decision
    ... Cantor showed how infinite sets could have different cardinality, ... i.e. irrationals like e.g. pi as well as the "other" reals. ... i.e. mistakes already at the level of mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
    ... Cantor says that the set of all finitely definable reals is ... > definitions of reals. ... > It's important that he never refers to an uncountable set of symbols ... infinite sets we can finitely define. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Galileos Paradox
    ... Cantor explained why he preferred his own definition. ... You might wondwer that there is no chance to define the reals at will. ... Cantor made a false promise when he said the essence of mathematics just ... Do you still not yet understand why DA2 lets no room as to define the ...
    (sci.math)