Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Oct 2005 22:57:33 +0300
"Robert Israel" <israel@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Phil Carmody wrote:
> > israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel) writes:
>
> > > And (i mod 10)^2, with i as a symbolic
> > > variable, evaluates to i^2.
>
> > That requires a leap of faith. Why is reduction modulu 10
> > an operation that just gets binned, but raising to the 2nd
> > power an operation that doesn't. Non-orthogonal behaviour.
> > It wouldn't bin an addition, multiplication or division by
> > a constant either, I'm sure; why is modular reduction
> > treated differently?
>
> One reason that i mod 10 gets evaluated to i is so that mod
> can be used with polynomials (and more general expressions):
Are you trying thus to contrast it against addition,
multiplication and exponentiation? Woh?!?!
> thus (365*x^26 + 525) mod 10 is evaluated as 5*x^26 + 5.
There are certain laws of distribution of one operation
over another that permit you to perform transformations
that will push constants to one side where they can thus
be simplified. (i mod 10)^2 in _no_ way matches any such
rule. Even the example you site changes its value with
the evaluation you state. That makes it a pretty wacky
example of "evaluation".
Phil
--
If a religion is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable
statements, then Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a religion, it
is the only religion that can prove itself to be one. -- John Barrow
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- References:
- Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: circle homeomorphism
- Next by Date: Re: flush
- Previous by thread: Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- Next by thread: Re: Big Bug in patched Maple 10 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|