Re: Is sci.math on the slide?


Robert J. Kolker wrote:
>
> john_ramsden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > I've noticed in recent months there seem to be much fewer
> > what I'd call substantial topics being discussed, and
> > compared to my recollection of, say, ten years ago,
> > it seems to be only a shadow of its former self.
>
> Solution: set up moderated groups.

Too slow and unresponsive - Take sci.physics.research,
for example, with its declared decision time for posts
of "up to five days".

.

Relevant Pages