Re: Tetration



Herman Bosch said:
> I am not a trained mathematician but in transcribing some inherited math notes I have come upon what seems to be a method of extending real numbers in tetration. I know that this has been done for complex numbers but I think not for the reals. At any rate what I perceive to be a novel approach to this problem is available to anyone with the time to check it out. Unfortunately the material is not in a form amenable to sending as an attachment but I would be more than
happy to provide anyone interested with hard copy. Meanwhile I will try to figure out a way to present part of it in a post to this forum.
>

Having looked up tetration just now, I am very interested to see any such
notes, as it sounds directly related to my base-free well-ordering of the reals
based on that very concept. My email is as listed, so if you succeed in getting
them into electronic format, I would be most pleased to see what you've got.

Good luck, and thanks.

--
Smiles,

Tony
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tetration
    ... Thanks, and good luck! ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... And both through the eye of the same needle!!! ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >>> Smiles, ... >>> Tony ... > 0.999...999 is the last first-level infinitesimal in the first unit. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
    ... infinity doesn't exist. ... Smiles, ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Deoxit
    ... Canada too... ... Best luck then! ... Tony ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.electronics.repair)