Re: infinity
- From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2005 12:54:34 -0700
sci.math_20050118_f:
Now to go back to the previous post, about the discussion of the
well-ordering of the unit interval by its normal, total ordering in as
necessary a non-standard model of the real numbers: if the infinite
sequence (0, iota, ...) represents the least two elements of the
non-negative reals, and each successive real in its normal ordering,
then the non-negative reals are well-ordered by their normal ordering.
sci.math_20050119:
Math is non-secular. If we talk about the infinite, it is not the
domain of any one group, but everybody, in particular mathematicians.
sci.math_20050119_b:
An obvious problem with that is that in the normal ordering if you did
select any finite integer n then there would be infinitely many values
of the sequence preceeding it, where the sequence is not to be doubly
infinite, that being an opposite of semi-infinite.
.
- References:
- Re: infinity
- From: zuhair
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: infinity
- From: Virgil
- Re: infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: Axiom of choice question
- Next by Date: Re: Pure mathematics as intellectual dead end
- Previous by thread: Re: infinity
- Next by thread: Re: infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|